TL;DR
Get workout gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A study of adults described as prefrail or frail found that 69.6% of those assigned to supervised high-intensity walking improved by one category on a frailty index, compared with 46.4% in a casual-speed group. The results suggest higher-intensity walking may be more effective on this measure, but the source provides limited details about the study and does not establish that the findings apply to everyone.
A 16-week study of prefrail and frail adults found that participants assigned to supervised high-intensity walking were more likely to improve by one category on a frailty measure than those assigned to casual-speed walking. The result, reported by Fit&Well, suggests that walking intensity may matter for this outcome, though it does not show that brisk walking is appropriate or more effective for every older adult.
Participants completed three supervised walking sessions a week over 16 weeks. The high-intensity group aimed to raise their pulse to 70% of maximum heart rate. The casual-speed group walked at self-selected speeds below 60% of maximum heart rate, according to the Fit&Well report.
Researchers assessed frailty using the Survey of Health Among Retired Europeans Frailty Index, or SHARE-FI. Its measures included self-reported fatigue and appetite loss, grip strength, ability to walk 100 meters or climb stairs without resting, and how often participants performed low- or moderate-energy daily tasks.
Fit&Well reported that 69.6% of the high-intensity group improved by one SHARE-FI category, compared with 46.4% of the casual-speed group. The source does not provide the number of participants, confidence intervals, or other statistical details, so the percentages alone do not show how precise or robust the difference was.
Walking Intensity and Frailty
The finding may help inform exercise plans for adults at risk of frailty: the pace and effort of walking, not only whether someone walks, could affect changes in a frailty measure. Both groups showed improvement, according to the report, while the higher-intensity group had a larger share of participants moving up one category.
That result is not a prescription for everyone to target 70% of maximum heart rate. The trial involved supervised sessions, and the source does not describe whether participants had health conditions or how their exercise was adapted. People who are frail, have ongoing health concerns, or are unsure what intensity is suitable should seek advice from a qualified health professional before changing their routine.
Products Worth Considering
Withings BPM Connect Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Blood Pressure Monitor
Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker – Porcelain/Silver
Bowflex SelectTech 840 Adjustable Kettlebell
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How the Walking Groups Differed
The study was framed around whether there is an optimal walking intensity for prefrail and frail adults. It compared a higher-effort target with self-selected walking below 60% of maximum heart rate; it did not compare walking with no exercise. The reported outcome was a change in one SHARE-FI category, rather than a broad assessment of every aspect of healthy aging.
Heart-rate targets are one way to describe exercise intensity. The Fit&Well report notes that trackers and smartwatches can display heart rate, but a device reading does not by itself establish that a target is safe or suitable. The study’s supervised format also differs from walking independently, where pace, terrain, and rest opportunities may vary.
“High-intensity walking can reverse frailty more effectively than casual-speed walking due to increased physiologic stimuli during more intensive activity.”
— The study authors, as quoted in the Fit&Well report
Limits of the Reported Findings
The supplied report does not identify the study’s publication, researchers, location, participant count, or participant characteristics beyond describing them as prefrail or frail adults. It also does not provide statistical tests, details about adherence, or information on adverse events. Those omissions make it difficult to judge how broadly the results apply or how certain the difference between groups is.
It is also unclear whether the improvement lasted after the 16-week program, whether participants improved in other health outcomes, or whether the same results would occur without supervision. The figures describe the share improving by one SHARE-FI category; they do not establish that every participant benefited or that the intervention prevented future frailty.
Questions for Further Research
Further reporting and the full study are needed to establish the sample size, methods, and statistical uncertainty, as well as whether benefits persisted after supervised training ended. Research comparing different walking intensities over longer periods could clarify which groups benefit and what level of supervision is needed.
For readers interested in increasing walking intensity, the study supports cautious attention to effort rather than an abrupt jump to its target. The Fit&Well report suggests beginning with short intervals of brisk and easy walking. Any plan should be adjusted to personal ability, with medical guidance for people with frailty, pre-existing conditions, or concerns about exercising at a higher intensity.
Key Questions
What type of walking did the study compare?
It compared supervised high-intensity walking, targeting 70% of maximum heart rate, with self-selected casual-speed walking below 60% of maximum heart rate.
How many participants improved on the frailty measure?
Fit&Well reported that 69.6% of the high-intensity group and 46.4% of the casual-speed group improved by one category on the SHARE-FI. The source does not give the group sizes or statistical details.
Does the study prove brisk walking reverses frailty?
No. The authors described high-intensity walking as potentially more effective, based on changes in the measured frailty index. The report does not establish that it reverses frailty in all people or produces lasting benefits.
Should older adults aim for 70% of maximum heart rate?
Not automatically. Participants exercised under supervision, and individual ability and health can affect what intensity is appropriate. People with frailty, pre-existing conditions, or uncertainty about exercise intensity should seek professional guidance before making a change.
Source: fitandwell.com
