I’ve narrowed this guide to three Torque Fitness machines that build strength in distinctly different ways: the TANK M1 Push Sled for all-surface pushing, the Relentless Ripper Ski Machine for measurable upper-body conditioning, and the Relentless Rope Trainer for hard, varied pulls from a rack or rig. My top pick for the broadest range of strength work is the TANK M1, while the Ripper is the more space-conscious choice for buyers who want workout metrics and repeatable intervals.
Get workout gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
These products are not interchangeable. The sled needs room to move, the ski machine needs a compatible mounting point and electrical power, and the rope trainer depends on a suitable rack or rig unless you add its separate wall-mount bracket. I rank them by how well each delivers its core training purpose, how much setup and space it asks of the buyer, and how clearly its features support practical home-gym use. The right pick hinges less on which machine sounds most versatile and more on whether you prefer pushing, skiing, or pulling.
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- TANK M1: My strongest general strength pick for buyers with usable outdoor or indoor floor space; its variable magnetic brake and all-surface design suit varied sled work.
- Relentless Ripper: Best for compact, trackable ski-style workouts, but it needs a compatible mount and corded electric power.
- Relentless Rope Trainer: The most direct choice for rope pulls and changing pull angles, with four resistance settings and resistance that responds to effort.
- The sled is the only option here that moves across the floor; both Relentless trainers rely on a rack, rig, or wall mounting setup.
- Choose by movement and installation first: a monitor cannot replace the sled’s open-space utility, and the sled cannot provide the Ripper’s workout data.
| Torque Fitness TANK M1 Push Sled |  | Best Overall for Versatile Sled Strength Work | Model: TANK M1 | Item type: Push sled | Operation: Manual | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Ripper Ski Machine |  | Best Compact Pick for Measurable Upper-Body Conditioning | Resistance: 10 levels of adjustable magnetic resistance | Monitor: Tracks time, heart rate, strokes per minute, watts, calories, and distance | Mounting: Compatible walls, Torque racks and rigs, and other manufacturer uprights | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Rope Trainer |  | Best Rack-Mounted Pick for Variable Rope Pulls | Resistance type: Magnetic | Resistance levels: 4 | Operation: Manual | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Torque Fitness strength equipment | Weight | Operation | Resistance | Warranty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Torque Fitness TANK M1 Push Sl | 67 pounds | Manual | Mag-Force variable resistance brake | 10 years on frame and welds; 1 year on parts and workmanship or materials |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Ripp | 50 pounds | — | 10 levels of adjustable magnetic resistance | 10 years on frame; 5 years on structural moving parts; 2 years on miscellaneous parts |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Rope | 45 pounds | Manual | — | — |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Torque Fitness TANK M1 Push Sled
The TANK M1 earns my best-overall slot because it offers a kind of training neither Relentless attachment can match: you push the equipment itself across a surface. Its Mag-Force variable resistance brake adds adjustable-feeling resistance without relying on a fixed set of numbered levels, making it suited to sled pushes and other movements where the user supplies the work. Torque describes it as an all-surface design, broadening where it can be used compared with the Ripper and Rope Trainer, both of which need a fixed mounting point.
That freedom comes with a space tradeoff. The M1 needs a clear route for movement, so it is a poor fit for a crowded room with no outdoor training area. At 67 pounds, it is also the heaviest of these three picks, and removable handles help with storage and transport but do not make the frame effortless to move. By contrast, the Ripper saves floor space once mounted and gives more explicit resistance settings and workout data; the M1 wins when the priority is moving resistance through space rather than logging intervals.
Its operation is manual, and the supplied description emphasizes quiet use, varied movements, and use on different surfaces rather than a screen or workout metrics. That makes this a straightforward choice for buyers who value physical work over digital feedback. Compared with the Rope Trainer, the TANK M1 supports a broader training environment, but it is less compact and does not offer the same rack-mounted rope-pulling format. I’d choose it for a home gym or training area with enough room to push, and skip it if portability, a small footprint, or on-screen workout tracking matters most.
Pros:- All-surface design supports use beyond a fixed rack or rig setup.
- Mag-Force variable resistance brake adapts the feel of sled work.
- Removable handles make storage and transport more manageable.
- Virtually silent operation suits settings where equipment noise matters.
Cons:- At 67 pounds, moving it into position can be cumbersome.
- Requires open space and a usable route rather than a compact mounting location.
- Does not include the Ripper’s workout monitor and tracked metrics.
Best for: Buyers with indoor or outdoor floor space who want a manually operated sled for varied pushing and resistance work.
Not ideal for: People with limited room, no suitable surface or route, or a strong need for workout metrics and easy relocation.
- Model:TANK M1
- Item type:Push sled
- Operation:Manual
- Resistance:Mag-Force variable resistance brake
- Handles:Removable
- Material:Alloy steel
- Weight:67 pounds
- Warranty:10 years on frame and welds; 1 year on parts and workmanship or materials
Our verdict“I’d choose the TANK M1 for the broadest practical strength role when there is enough space to push it.”
Torque Fitness Relentless Ripper Ski Machine
The Relentless Ripper Ski Machine is my choice for buyers who want a defined, repeatable ski-pull workout without dedicating floor space to a free-standing machine. It can mount to compatible Torque racks and rigs, other manufacturer uprights, or a wall, and its listed dimensions are 24.5 x 21 x 39.1 inches. Once a suitable mounting point is in place, that format can keep the training area clearer than the TANK M1’s moving route or the Rope Trainer’s hanging rope setup.
Its clearest advantage over the Rope Trainer is ten adjustable magnetic resistance levels and a monitor that records several workout measures, including time, watts, calories, distance, heart rate, and strokes per minute. That gives buyers more information for comparing sessions and shaping intervals. The ergonomic grips are intended to support single- and double-pole movements, so the unit offers more than one way to perform its ski-style pull. The Rope Trainer, in contrast, centers on bidirectional rope work and resistance that increases with faster or harder pulls; it is the more specialized choice if rope pulling is the main goal.
The Ripper’s compactness depends on a few conditions. It needs a compatible, secure mounting surface, and its corded electric power can limit where that surface is practical. Those requirements make it less flexible to place than the manually operated TANK M1, which can simply be moved to a training route, while the Ripper’s monitor makes it better suited to structured, trackable sessions. Its 50-pound weight is also worth planning around during installation. I’d favor this machine for buyers who can mount it near power and want adjustable, metric-driven ski training; I’d pass if the room lacks a suitable mount or outlet.
Pros:- Ten magnetic resistance levels give more selectable adjustment than the Rope Trainer’s four.
- LED monitor tracks several workout measures, including watts and distance.
- Wall, rack, and rig mounting can preserve floor space.
- Ergonomic grips support both single- and double-pole movements.
Cons:- Requires a compatible mounting point, which may constrain installation.
- Corded electric operation limits placement compared with the manual TANK M1.
- At 50 pounds, it takes planning to position and mount.
Best for: Home-gym users with a compatible rack, rig, or wall and nearby power who want ski-style pulling with workout data.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need a fully portable, manually operated option or cannot provide a suitable mounting surface and electrical outlet.
- Resistance:10 levels of adjustable magnetic resistance
- Monitor:Tracks time, heart rate, strokes per minute, watts, calories, and distance
- Mounting:Compatible walls, Torque racks and rigs, and other manufacturer uprights
- Handle type:Ergonomic
- Display:LED
- Power:Corded electric
- Weight:50 pounds
- Dimensions:24.5 x 21 x 39.1 inches (D x W x H)
- Warranty:10 years on frame; 5 years on structural moving parts; 2 years on miscellaneous parts
Our verdict“I’d pick the Ripper for compact, measurable ski training when the mounting location and power supply are already workable.”
Torque Fitness Relentless Rope Trainer
The Relentless Rope Trainer suits buyers who specifically want rope-based pulling rather than a ski machine’s pole strokes or the TANK M1’s floor-moving push. Its three-strand, marine-grade rope supports bidirectional movement and varied pulling angles, while the magnetic resistance rises as the user pulls faster or harder. That responsive feel distinguishes it from a machine where the user simply selects a fixed workout level before starting.
Four resistance settings provide a degree of control, though they are fewer than the Ripper’s ten selectable levels. There is no listed workout monitor, so buyers who want watts, distance, or session metrics should look to the Ripper instead. The rope unit’s more compact listed dimensions—17 x 10 x 16 inches—make the attachment itself less demanding to store than a sled, but its 45-pound weight and fixed-use mounting still matter. It attaches to racks or rigs with tubing up to 6 by 6 inches; a separate wall-mount bracket is available, so a wall setup adds another requirement.
This is the most focused option in the lineup. It can suit a training space that already has a compatible rack and wants a pulling station without bringing in a sled or a larger cardio-style trainer. Yet its value to a buyer depends on that equipment match: unlike the TANK M1, it cannot be pushed across a training surface, and unlike the Ripper, its listed use centers on rope pulls rather than ski-pole movements with performance tracking. I’d choose it for varied, effort-responsive rope work in a rack-equipped gym. I’d skip it if the rack dimensions do not match, if you need an included wall bracket, or if digital tracking is part of the training plan.
Pros:- Magnetic resistance responds to faster or harder pulls.
- Bidirectional rope movement accommodates varied pulling angles.
- Four selectable resistance levels offer control over the training feel.
- Marine-grade, three-strand rope is specified for the trainer.
Cons:- Fits racks or rigs with tubing no larger than 6 by 6 inches.
- Optional wall-mount bracket is sold separately.
- At 45 pounds, it is not a featherweight attachment to position.
Best for: Rack or rig owners seeking bidirectional rope training with resistance that responds to pulling speed and effort.
Not ideal for: People without a compatible rack or rig, buyers who need a monitor, or anyone seeking a movable sled or ski-pole trainer.
- Resistance type:Magnetic
- Resistance levels:4
- Operation:Manual
- Control:Lever
- Rope:Three-strand twisted marine-grade rope
- Compatibility:Racks or rigs with tubing up to 6 x 6 inches
- Mounting:Rack or rig attachment; optional wall-mount bracket sold separately
- Weight:45 pounds
- Dimensions:17 x 10 x 16 inches (D x W x H)
Our verdict“I’d choose the Rope Trainer when rope pulls are the priority and a compatible rack or rig is already in place.”
How We Picked
I compared these three Torque Fitness products as strength-training tools, not as a single category of machines with identical jobs. Each serves a different movement pattern: the TANK M1 is a manually pushed sled, the Ripper recreates ski-pole strokes with adjustable magnetic resistance, and the Rope Trainer provides bidirectional pulling through a marine-grade rope. My ranking reflects how directly each product serves its intended training role and how much space, mounting, power, and handling it requires.
I gave weight to the details that change a buyer’s day-to-day use: resistance adjustment, movement options, installation needs, footprint, and tracking. The Ripper ranks highly for structured workouts because its LED monitor reports time, heart rate, stroke rate, watts, calories, and distance, but its mounting and corded power restrict placement. The Rope Trainer offers a focused, responsive pulling experience in a compact attachment, though its four settings give less choice than the Ripper’s ten levels and it still needs a compatible rack or rig. The TANK M1 takes the top overall position because it combines variable resistance, removable handles, and all-surface use without relying on a fixed installation.
I also treated disclosed drawbacks as part of the decision rather than as footnotes. A 67-pound sled can be awkward to relocate; a 45-pound rope unit still needs a secure attachment; and a wall-mounted ski trainer is only compact if the mounting location and power outlet work for the room. Product descriptions do not establish a universal winner for every training style, so my recommendations separate general strength versatility from specialized conditioning and pulling needs. I do not infer performance claims beyond the supplied product details.
| Torque Fitness strength equipment | Mounting |
|---|---|
| Torque Fitness TANK M1 Push Sl | — |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Ripp | Compatible walls, Torque racks and rigs, and other manufacturer uprights |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Rope | Rack or rig attachment; optional wall-mount bracket sold separately |
Factors to Consider When Choosing Best Torque Fitness Strength Equipment
I’d start with the movement you want to train, then check the room and equipment that movement requires. These Torque Fitness products differ more by setup and training pattern than by a simple feature ladder.Choose the movement before comparing features
The TANK M1 is for pushing a sled over a usable route; the Ripper is for ski-style pole strokes; the Rope Trainer is for bidirectional rope pulls. That distinction should lead the decision. A monitor or a higher number of resistance settings cannot replace a movement pattern you actually want to train, and the sled’s all-surface use does not make it a substitute for a mounted pull station. If you want general sled work, focus on the M1. If you want repeatable ski intervals, the Ripper has the clearest fit. If rope pulls and changing angles are the goal, the Rope Trainer is the purpose-built choice.
Map out the installation and training space
The Ripper and Rope Trainer need a secure mounting location, but their placement details differ. The Ripper supports compatible walls, Torque racks and rigs, and other manufacturer uprights, then also needs corded electric power. The Rope Trainer attaches to racks or rigs with tubing no larger than 6 by 6 inches; a wall bracket is sold separately. Check both the structure and the surrounding clearance before committing. The TANK M1 avoids fixed installation, but its advantage only matters if there is enough room and a suitable route to push it. Compact storage does not equal compact use: the sled still needs a movement area.
Match resistance control to your workout style
The Ripper gives the most explicit selection range with 10 magnetic resistance levels, while the Rope Trainer offers four levels and also responds to how quickly or forcefully the rope is pulled. The TANK M1 uses a Mag-Force variable resistance brake, but the supplied details do not list numbered settings. If you want repeatable adjustments and session comparison, the Ripper’s monitor and level selection are a strong match. If you prefer effort-responsive rope work, the Rope Trainer has a distinct case. For sled pushing, the M1’s variable resistance and manual operation matter more than display data.
Decide whether workout data matters
Only the Relentless Ripper lists an onboard performance monitor. Its LED display reports time, heart rate, strokes per minute, watts, calories, and distance, which can help users structure sessions and compare effort. Neither the Rope Trainer nor the TANK M1 is described with a workout monitor, so buyers who want those figures should not assume that a mounted or manual machine supplies them. If you track training through another device or prefer to focus on movement and effort, the Ripper’s screen may matter less than the Rope Trainer’s pulling action or the sled’s open-space versatility.
Account for handling, storage, and warranty details
The listed weights are 45 pounds for the Rope Trainer, 50 pounds for the Ripper, and 67 pounds for the TANK M1. Those numbers affect setup and relocation, especially for a buyer installing a wall-mounted machine or moving a sled between storage and a training route. The M1 has removable handles, which aid storage and transport, but its weight remains a practical factor. Warranty coverage also varies: the Ripper lists a 10-year frame warranty, five years on structural moving parts, and two years on miscellaneous parts; the M1 lists 10 years on frame and welds plus one year on parts and workmanship or materials. No warranty term was supplied for the Rope Trainer, so I would confirm coverage with the seller before purchase.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Torque Fitness option is the best all-around strength pick?
I’d choose the TANK M1 Push Sled for the broadest general strength role among these three, provided there is enough space to use it. It offers variable resistance and an all-surface design without requiring a rack, rig, wall bracket, or electrical connection. Its tradeoff is the need for a clear route and the challenge of handling a 67-pound sled. Buyers wanting compact, mounted training should look instead at the Ripper or Rope Trainer.
Which product takes up the least space?
The Relentless Rope Trainer has the smallest listed dimensions at 17 x 10 x 16 inches, though it still requires a compatible rack or rig, or an optional wall-mount bracket. The Ripper is also designed to preserve floor space through wall, rack, or rig mounting, but it has a larger listed footprint and needs corded electric power. The M1 needs no permanent installation, yet it requires a usable area to move across when training.
Which machine provides workout tracking?
The Relentless Ripper Ski Machine is the only product in this roundup described with a performance monitor. Its LED display tracks time, heart rate, strokes per minute, watts, calories, and distance. The Rope Trainer and TANK M1 are described as manual training equipment without listed workout displays, so I would not choose either if onboard metrics are a requirement.
Can I mount the Rope Trainer on a wall?
The Rope Trainer’s standard described setup attaches to racks or rigs with tubing up to 6 by 6 inches. A wall-mount bracket is sold separately, so wall installation is possible only with that additional mounting piece and a suitable wall. I’d verify both compatibility and installation requirements before choosing it, particularly if the training space does not already have a rack or rig.
Which option is best if I do not want to install equipment?
The TANK M1 is the clearest fit because it is manually operated and does not depend on a permanent rack, rig, or wall mount. That does not make it effortless to use: it weighs 67 pounds and needs space for movement. The Ripper requires a compatible mounting location and corded power, while the Rope Trainer also needs a rack, rig, or separately purchased wall-mount bracket.
Conclusion
I’d buy the TANK M1 Push Sled if I had a suitable training route and wanted the most flexible option for manually driven sled work. For a buyer with a rack or wall and nearby power who values structured ski-style sessions and workout metrics, the Relentless Ripper is the more targeted choice. If the gym already has a compatible rack and rope pulls are the main goal, I’d choose the Relentless Rope Trainer for its responsive resistance and bidirectional action. The main decision is straightforward: match the product to your preferred movement, then make sure your space, mounting, and handling needs fit that choice.
